Grace Understood

Is Holiness Desired

May 23

May 22
This is always nice to wake up to.  (Taken with instagram)

This is always nice to wake up to. (Taken with instagram)


May 21
Best sweater ever (Taken with instagram)

Best sweater ever (Taken with instagram)


“Because children have abounding vitality, because they are in spirit fierce and free, therefore they want things repeated and unchanged. They always say, “Do it again”; and the grown-up person does it again until he is nearly dead. For grown-up people are not strong enough to exult in monotony. But perhaps God is strong enough to exult in monotony. It is possible that God says every morning, “Do it again” to the sun; and every evening, “Do it again” to the moon. It may not be automatic necessity that makes all daisies alike; it may be that God makes every daisy separately, but has never got tired of making them. It may be that He has the eternal appetite of infancy; for we have sinned and grown old, and our Father is younger than we.”
Chesterton”

May 10

James Study

Here are all the vids for the James study we just finished. 


Suffering

THis is perhaps the best sermon I’ve ever heard on suffering. It is well worth your time. 

Below is a small excerpt. You can read and watch the whole thing here


Sep 7

2 book reviews in 1

last week I breezed through “Zero” by Charles Seife. After reading “Here’s Looking at Euclid”, this book was a little repetitive. I’m not sure which came out first, but they have an amazing amount of similar content. Not word for word, but the paragraphs are structured strangely similarly (say that 10 times fast). 

It was the history of Zero, but also the history of mathematics. If you’re into that sort of topic and don’t have much time to read, I would recommend this book. It’s quick, entertaining, and a great vacation book. 

I also painfully made my way through this book. It’s written by Natalie Angier who writes on biology for the New York Times. In the science realm biologists are kind of looked down upon. They’re more historians than mathematicians and scientists. And many slowly grow into the role of Priest and Prophet for the church of Darwin (i.e. Dawkins and Hitchens). Natalie fits this description to a T.

The book is written in contemporary style, so a certain level of confidence is needed. But Angier turn this confidence into stark condescension. The first chapter on thinking like a scientist is supposed to high light the unbiased nature of scientific thought. But this may be one of the most biased chapters I’ve ever read. It’s irony was glorious. She rants about those darn creationists as if Natural Selection should have weeded them out millennia ago.

The language is cumbersome and forced. The facts are hidden and the reader treated like a toddler. If any naturalists states that biologists have risen above the need for religion, then hand them this book. She refers to her first high power microscope in evangelical terms. A Hallelujah escaped from her lips as she was finally able to see the light. 

I would not recommend this book. And because of it, my recent fascination with scientific histories has waned. I’m changing directions.

I’m currently reading a biography of Harriet Tubman. It’s amazing and horrific at the same time. There have been two times I couldn’t see the page because of the tears in my eyes. I’ll fill you in next time. 


Aug 27

Here’s Looking at Euclid

book cover

I just finished Here’s Looking at Euclid by Alex Bellos. It was…in a word…great!

It’s a short history and explanation of most of the fields that comprise ancient and modern math. I’m not much of a Math guy. It was my worst subject in school, except for Geometry which I loved. But this book got me really interested in exploring it a bit further. It made Math extremely interesting and put on the display the highly playful nature of the discipline. 

It really is amazing to behold the leaps of intellect that were needed to create written numbers and mathematical concepts. The book traces the invention of written numerals, the use of the abacus, Euclid’s geometry, and the other realms of math that are actually useful.

Then the book heads off into the territory of theoretical math, or math that cannot be used on a daily basis. This includes algebra, the cults of numerology, pi, math games and puzzles, number series, the golden ration, probability, statistics, and finally ends with the newest advancements with the number infinity (in which i learned there are infinities that are countable and those that are not- i.e. smaller and larger sets of infinite numbers…mind=blown)

There are also bonus appendices on the author’s website.

I highly recommend the book, and enjoyed it so much I’m moving on to read the History of Zero, and Simplexity. I also grabbed a copy of Flatland at the Library which will be very interesting. 

Until the next book…


Aug 23

When You Are Engulfed In Flames: David Sedaris

book cover

So…I’m supposed to stick to the classics. But I’m figuring out you really have to be in the mood and you cannot, under any circumstances, visit a book store, Goodreads.com, or a Library. There are just too many awesome books out there. So…I’m giving myself leniency. I’ve put aside Oliver Twist for a little while and am following my curiosity wherever it may lead.

I finished When You Are Engulfed In Flames by Sedaris a few days ago. I was super excited to finally get my hands on one of his books. I’ve heard him read on NPR and seen interviews. He seemed quirky enough to me, so I read the book in about 2 days.

I was kind of let down. Is he a good writer? Yes…absolutely. Is he pretty funny? Yep. But I was expecting something beneath the surface. When you read Vonnegut or even Bill Bryson, there is a purpose for the comedy and humor. Truth is weaved in between the lines. You find yourself laughing and then a split second later saying, “Hey…wait a minute.” This is especially true with Vonnegut.

But Sedaris is…well…pretty darn shallow. His attempts at creativity do not work (like his chapter on graduating from Princeton). After finishing the book it makes sense. Though he has lived a pretty crazy life (hitch-hiking around, doing drugs, being solicited by truck drivers, drugs…etc), in retrospect it is a very self serving and empty life. Unintentionally he causes the reader to pause and take pity on him. I found myself saying over and over again, “Yes, but what did you learn because of this. How did you change your life. What in the world are you doing with your life besides shopping, traveling, and complaining.”

Though he is very talented, and has a very individual voice in his essays, this book was a simple mind diversion. You walk away not having learned anything and you’ve lost a few hours you can’t get back. This is very similar to feeling he must feel as he lies in bed at night. “What in the world have I done with my life. This is pointless.”

So if you want an entertaining read and don’t mind the occasional reference to his sexuality, racial slur, and F-bomb…then this might be a good book for you. But again, don’t but it. This is not one you’ll display prominently on your book shelf. 

In my opinion your better off picking something else. But not many agree with me…so there you go. 

(Book Count: 4 / 9 days)


Aug 21

There Is A God

Antony Flew

I just finished ‘There Is A God” by Antony Flew, a world renowned atheist that converted to Theism in 2004. He’s the studly man in the picture above.

This book was pretty good, though not a real light read. It is written in two parts: My Denial of the Divine, and My Discovery of the Divine.

Don’t read to much into Theism. Flew does not believe in the Christian God revealed in Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. He simply believes, based upon Scientific evidence and Philosophical reason that there must be an intelligent, omniscient, eternal creator. But that’s about as far as he goes. After life…forget about it.

He tends to go on many tangents throughout the book but it is well worth the read. I would recommend it to anyone with a high respect or working knowledge of Dawkins or Hitchens form of “New Atheism”. Flew tears them a new one…

He exposes, in an intelligent and logical way, their religious zest and emotional need to convert others to their religion, which isn’t in any way based on facts.

I loved it. You can get it here. 

(BOOK COUNT: 3 in 7 days)


Page 1 of 3